Thread:Pasonia/@comment-1904799-20131001202843/@comment-3041235-20131005103733

I've already understood it, and I've already told you what I think of it. You insist it is not what I thought it was because you insisted I misunderstood you, but the facts lay themselves bare. There is considerable discrimination between two very similar kinds of trivia, and I'm saying that your being selective about it is making things very unclear what is allowed/not allowed.

I knew you didn't even take my POV into consideration because you refused to acknowledge, not even once, that the trivia about Monokuma and Doraemon sharing the same seiyuu actually meant something. While I might not be the most clear on the seiyuu selection process, did they not notice that there would be some interesting juxtapositioning of two very different kinds of anthromorphic characters played by the same person? Can you very clearly claim that was not the case?

I mean, after all, it was you who said these guys had to go through a selection process sans Peko's seiyuu, who was directly asked to do Peko's voice. Surely, the voice and the characterizations meant something? I never understood this very distinct discrimination of two very trivia-worthy notes, and I've asked you to clarify it time and again only for you to keep telling me "Peko voice actor was directly approached which was amazingly atypical, Monokuma and Doraemon having the same seiyuu has absolutely no bearing" over and over and over and over."

I honestly don't want to have another wiki's idea of professionalism be transplanted wholesale into the DR Wiki, but you keep insisting. Really, we're all just fans of DR here, why make it so frickin' stringent? We know how to self-police, there's no need to go over the line just because some bits of trivia don't even make sense.

On that note, if the Monokuma/Doraemon one didn't make sense, how did favorite foods become relevant then (as is with Hinata)? Or of favorite drinks (as is with Yamada)?

I keep telling you trivia is trivia, there's no need to categorize them according to "relation" or otherwise because of that frickin' quote of the definition of trivia I transplanted from a dictionary site; are you saying that you'll just frickin' ignore what a god damned piece of "trivia" means and go ahead and say "unrelated things to my eyes GTFO"?

I've seen this argument of trivia through your POV, and these are the conclusions I am getting that you and I both know you can't get away from. You are very welcome to pry them one by one and refute me, though, if you so feel you're wronged.