Thread:Starly545/@comment-33561080-20161223155018

What's the problem if there's a valuable source added in an article? Is that something that bothers you? Are you getting sick of looking at "[1], [2]" link? I know that kinda information is kinda obvious, but don't you think backing it up with a trusted source is a bad, disgusting, frustating, terrible idea? Is that what you think?

I'm so done with you regarding this matters. Why you just don't understand that this wiki is lacking of source? I just want to edit the wiki properly, with a source, so that the readers can fully trusted our edits.

If you say that the information is obvious then why don't you add it after DR3 finished airing? Tell me that you don't notice it until I put that information on the article, correct?

Make this message as the last warning. Oh, and thank you for giving me a painful terrible headache. I really appreciate it. 