Thread:Starly545/@comment-33561080-20161223155018

What's the problem if there's a valuable source added in an article? Is that something that bothers you? Are you getting sick of looking at "[1], [2]" link? I know that kinda information is kinda obvious, but don't you think backing it up with a trusted source is a bad, disgusting, frustating, terrible idea? Is that what you think?

I'm so done with you regarding this matters. Why you just don't understand that this wiki is lacking of source? I just want to edit the wiki properly, with a source, so that the readers can fully trusted our edits.

Make this message as the last warning. Oh, and thank you for giving me a terrible headache. I really appreciate it. 