Thread:Toivotus/@comment-24690456-20180209145634

Hello Toivotus.

I and the other admins have discussed this that we've decided to list UTPD Nanami's identity as ambiguous for several reasons. It never blatantly mentioned that the one who appeared in UTPD is her DR3/Human identity. You wrote this on her DR3 page.
 * "In the non-canon bonus mode universe, Chiaki appears as a student of Hope's Peak Academy and is based on her human self, though she wears the AI version's clothing."

It is a very bold and speculative statement. You say that she is based on her human self with her AI clothing, but really...? Do you have any evidence to that? The admins have come into realization that her identity remain ambiguous because the event itself is non-canonical, and there are so many contradiction left here and there. For example, Hinata and Kamukura & Monomi and Usami exist during the event, so we don't know which one is the "canonical" in UTPD universe. Is it Hinata/Monomi, or Kamukura/Usami who exist in the canonical timeline of UTPD? No one knows except the creator himself.

Hence why I left this before:
 * "Since the events itself is non-canonical, the identity of Chiaki that appeared in the Ultimate Talent Development Plan remain ambiguous."

You make a large change on the Wiki without consulting the staff, that is your biggest mistake and the main reason why I even bother to write this entire message. You don't even back up yourself with solid canon evidence because there's literally nothing! UTPD's canonical story is ambiguous.

The next time you want to edit these big changes, please please please, consult with the admins beforehand. If not all of us, at least one of us is always active on the Wiki depends on our timeline, so we're ready to help you whenever you need us.

And I don't want you to be a silent reader, please respond to this wall once you finished reading it.

Thank you :) 