Thread:Yazawaa/@comment-3522837-20161114095215/@comment-25167224-20161114132437

because i cannot prove it through links, as the person who's account this was associated reach weibo to which i do not have access to because of a language barrier, as well as the only pixiv id i could reach being deactivated. so i'm going to use visual evidence instead.



this on the right is an official image. as you can see it features both naegi and hinata, additionally it has the quality of a scanned image to make it more convincing (here's a link of the tumblr post that uses the same cut as the wikia does ), clearly official based even just solely on the art style and understand of anatomy.

so explain to me, why in the world would there be a need to drastically change the image of naegi had he been edited into a picture with komaeda?



not to mention that the image with naegi and komaeda is clealy unfished. look at komaeda's neck, that's his hood coming straight through it, not to mention his hand behind naegi makes no sense. do you really think that's how official art looks?

the logo means nothing, and actually proves furthermore this is fan made. notice something about the naegi and hinata image? yeah, it doesn't have a watermark. why? because it is actually a part of the reload art book gallery. just pretty pictures all put together for the pleasure of viewing for the ones who purchased. it hasn't been teased anywhere online, and if it were it would have a proper 'sample' text over it in similar fashion to this postcard below. (and the teases that i do remember from back in the day have been very rough and unfinished, and all featured the samle watermark).



additionally, here's an actual scanned page showing the hinata and naegi image does indeed come from the reload artbook. i have not been able to find a single one regarding the komaeda and naegi image, and that'd be the most popular by far.

plus as i said, i've found some links regarding this reaching weibo and pixiv.

if anything the person who uploaded this should be questioned about the autenticity of the image they posted as despite my researching i have not been able to find a single confirmed scan. otherwise the wikia is hosting an image that has no official ties without credit, and one the artist has gotten rid of.